(C. UmiltÃ )

I run ML search with expectation values as input data. Information on dc02 maps can be found here. I try three different configurations:

- all parameters (\(r, A_d, A_s, A_L) \) are zeroed except one, for which I test if the ML search can recover different expectation values. I vary one variable and plot that variable only, while all other parameters are zeroed and kept fixed in the ML search;
- same as before, only parameters which are not varied are kept fixed at their normal expectation value;
- all parameters are set free, and for one of them I test different expectation values. I vary the expectation value of one variable and plot that variable only but the ML search fits all of them.

- overall precision is at worst ~0.1%;
- \(r\) precision degrades more than other parameters as parameters are set free;
- priors don't seem to affect the precision on recovery of \(A_d, A_s\);
- when all parameters are zeroed, negative \(r\) is not recovered, but this is strongly not physical. Instead when foregrounds and lensing are not zero even negative \(r\) values are recovered correctly.